William Greaves, Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take One

ANAÏS DUPLAN

 
 

Audio: Anaïs Duplan reads.

 
 
 

Alice and Freddie rehearse. “What’s the matter with you?” 
“You know perfectly well what I’m talking about.”          Look into what you’ve been doing, says Alice.         
Cut out all the double-talk, Freddie counters, you’ve got me foxed. You’re really something.    
You think everyone in the world is stupid              except for you, says Alice. A white couple 
having a gender-normative argument 
in the late sixties. “I’m a woman and not a fool, Freddie. 
I know what goes on 
around me,” continues Alice. 
“Him?” Freddie is incredulous.     Yes, him, that faggot boy. 
A different woman plays Alice now.     “You’ve been killing my babies 
one right after the other.” 
She’s been through abortion after abortion.      The scene cycles 
through seemingly every social issue except for race.
I can’t 
help but think about Greaves being behind this, a Black director 
of white drama.    They keep repeating the word, “faggot.” 
Freddie says Alice is projecting 
onto him what she sees in her own self. 
Does he mean Alice is closeted? He couldn’t possibly mean that. 
“You just want the gay world, Freddie,” Alice screams.     Hell, I want the gay
world, but it’s not the same world Alice is talking about.     Microphone feedback 
once Alice starts yelling, 
“Fuck you!” 
For the first time, 
a shot of the camera crew.     This is around four minutes in. 
The director, Bill Greaves 
comments that the audio quality is dreadful.         A montage of American people
in a New York City park: a Black family, 
then mostly whites as the microphone feedback 
blends into a funky groove.     Leisuring 
in the park are loving couples, images of romance, 
babies. It’s the circle of life. Black baby and white baby,   Black family walking with their baby, 
a woman’s armed hooked around a man’s    slightly,     an older child rolling in the grass, 
an East Asian family, a slightly older child shirtless,
looking around, lying down 
in the grass, then young men playing soccer,
wearing yarmulkes,
people in their twenties with bikes.             Microphone feedback
continues to pitch up, higher and higher,         before a guitar riff settles in.     Bill Greaves 
wearing a fabulous green mesh shirt. 
He has a charming relationship 
to his actors. He instructs them,
“The name of the game is sexuality.” 
Everything that happens on the set, whether it’s among the actors 
or the crew, should be shot constantly.
Here’s that woman 
with the tits, says Bill excitedly. Get her.
“They’re bouncing, chaps.” 
He sounds like a porno director. Don’t
take me seriously, he chides. 
The director is directing the person in charge of filming this film being filmed. 
If you see us in trouble,     come and help us out. His name is Terry, 
the man who’s in charge of shooting the actors. Terry’s asking questions. 
Someone else is in charge of shooting     Terry shooting the actors. The actors are in two shots 
on screen at the same time. 
Terry says they ought to start with a fresh magazine. 
Members of the crew argue about where the magazine is. 
I can feel the excitement both of the crew and public, 
who watch from the side,  about the shooting of this movie, an excitement 
which will fade as production wears on.         What it means to document 
Black people in the park.         Note the editing here.
You see that the editor has left intact both the inanity and the public’s excitement. 
The name right now of the picture is Over the Cliff
but it might be changed, Bill explains 
to a crowd he’s asking to be very quiet. Did he decide
already then 
the film was going to be 
what it was?         The police check what’s going on. 
Fourteen minutes in, we’re preparing to start shooting. 
It doesn’t feel like 
one of those “behind the scenes” productions because everything 
is behind the scenes. Freddie asks 
a question about how exactly 
to approach Alice. He wants to make it 
look like he’s been chasing her around the park 
for hours. He thinks 
he should start the scene from several yards behind her.      Alice asks Bill 
if she’s walking too quickly. He affirms. 
She says she thinks she is         going home; she has to find a way to walk home 
and make it look like         she’s walking quickly, but walk slowly. 
Each of the actors trying
to imagine the interior worlds 
of their characters. The crew works 
towards the film they imagine is the one Greaves wants. 
They don’t know what he wants. The crew 
is going to rap a little bit about the film. 
Bob, who is obviously the crew leader, 
says Greaves has no idea what he’s doing. The whole crew 
without its director, beyond the reach
of the actors. This conversation isn’t part 
of the film, which is open-ended, plotless, 
without end. We can only fill in the gaps about the film 
we understand ourselves to be watching. 
We can only conclude     he wanted it like this,
says a member of the crew. This debate        
is like the one people have when arguing 
about whether God is intelligent or if 
there is no God because how could there be a God 
if there is all this chaos.          Another member 
of the crew asserts that Bill wants them 
to help make the film, but Bob thinks Bill 
is so far into the making the film 
he has no perspective.             Meanwhile the actors know         only their lines. 
Everyone has     a sort of myopia. 
They function     like a chorus to Bill’s 
unstated thoughts. 
The crew is interracial. 
They’ve been filming for four days.         “He doesn’t know how to direct,” 
says a cool-looking Black guy     wearing sunglasses and a scarf around his neck. 
Instead of talking about how good or bad 
his direction is, let’s talk about how interesting
  his “non-direction” is. 
This filmed conversation     is the crew leaving a note to Bill     “and anyone else 
who may be watching,” says Bob.     This two-hour clip of film that Bill 
can edit any way he wants. 
A director’s film is his mind 
photographing the world, but does the director know 
what’s in his own mind? Bill Greaves walks around the park 
alone as the crew talks about him, a hilarious montage that invites speculation as to
whether he’s a total idiot. Who is shooting him? Bill argues with the crew. He seems
delightfully confused, or oblivious. Every time you’ve had sex with me, it’s as though you’ve
raped me, says Alice. Bill tells the actors to do whatever comes naturally. All of these guys are
geared to capture the reality of the moment. He’s trying to make a non-film and the actors are
delighted, the only ones who seem to share the director’s excitement. The only ones who get to
be oblivious to the action. The central drama is Alice’s heartbreak over this man being gay, but
it’s hard to relate to her because she calls him a “faggot.” The acting has actually improved at
this later take. The chemistry is unbelievable. There’s a real relationship between them. The
shooting is a little crazy, continually zooming into their faces, now scrolling over to Bill’s face,
who briefly, accidentally, looks into the camera then looks away. They run out of film. 

I’m laughing as Bill asks the actors     how they feel about the scene.     He seems to be inviting chaos.
Alice says she needs to slow down         and blames    
“plain old insecurity” for her rushed performance.  Freddie wants 
just to act better. Alice is every American woman     and Freddie is every American man. 
It’s like these lines were planted in their heads, they’re so generic. “You’re ineffectual.” A camera person says 
Bill is also acting and Bill is a bad actor.     “That’s immaterial,” says someone else.     But he acts off-camera, he 
is performative. The director is hiding.    He needs to find out where the lines 
between everyone else’s acting and his own meet.     They seem 
to be getting somewhere with figuring out         why the film is happening.    
Freddie asks if he should be playing a “faggy fag or a butch fag.”     He embodies a kind of masculinity 
as he’s trying to figure out how to play
a fag. Which would you prefer to play, asks Bill. 
I would prefer to play a closet fag, answers Freddie.
Bill assures Alice about her performance. The more she leans into her character, the funnier. 
The film is about     how much these actors can be lured in,     in this real way, into these fake 
characters in this fake movie. 
How many times can you watch 
the same scene? But the scene develops. 
There’s a little more of a story. They become     more emotional, more incredulous. 
You believe them more and more. She’s getting upset.     “Why should I take it easy?” 

It’s not going well. Alice walks away.     “It’s a certain experiment.”      He’s doing a screen test
 or just one piece of dialogue in different ways. But why film it? 
Why give them lines?     You should give them a story
 instead of giving them lines. 
 The story could be anywhere. 
 He could do it on a stage. 
 He’s making a film that’s designed 

to be a work of art. 
The crew discussing the film enacts    
the audience having a conversation, 
playing out their thoughts on the film, 
so that you can’t watch it and talk 
about it and not be part of it. There’s argument     about what is happening, a collective 
exploration of the levels of reality     and “supra levels of reality.” The men 
of the crew interrupting the women, playing their roles. “Maybe we’re all acting.” 
The genius of this film is that it was provided for that somewhere     during the film 
the crew would take control. “You believe in God after all.”         Laughter. A faggot is not a homosexual.
“Faggot” is a mentality.     A faggot doesn’t know what he wants.     All I really know is myself. Eight days 
of horrible conversation, horrible Black faces,     white faces, tall ones, old ones. The crew is sleeping; 
they’re over it. Come up with a better script,     a screen test for a pair of actors. Talk 
in a more sexually explicit way, suggests a member of the crew. “Don’t you like me to eat you,
Alice?” The film is a useless faggotry, 
a semi-annual conceit between two people. 
Make it into something that never has to be repeated again. 
Greaves says the screen test is unsatisfactory    from the standpoint of the actors and from his own. 
Now they must undertake    to improvise something better, a “palace revolt.” Revolution. 
The crew hates him.     Greaves represents the establishment,     trying to get the crew to do something 
they’ve become disenchanted with.     Come up with better suggestions. It doesn’t matter    
if you understand. We should
surface from this experience 
with something that’s the result 
of our collective, creative efforts. 
The actors (I wrote “artists” by accident) start     singing. The crew can’t take that     for very long so they start
asking questions and interjecting and giving      Bill struggle. The actors    give suggestions, too. 
“I think we can use this,”
concludes Bill. It will add interesting 
texture to the film. The crew doesn’t think so.         They think it sounds terrible. 
“There’s no sense of reality.” Who goes about singing     to each other? They together 
try to figure out what is real.     Someone approaches the crew, a personality, Victor
Vikowski: the interloper. Get a release form for this gentlemen, 
orders Bill. He’s been living in the bushes and got kicked out 
of his apartment, which he was paying $45/week to live in.         “Are you such a virgin like I am?” 
He could be drunk.         “We’re virgins in the brain if you want 
to be that way.” Can’t we be ourselves? 
He’s talking about sucking, sexual     freedom. He’s exactly what the film needed, 
someone who is so totally himself. He hates     bullshit. He went to Columbia for four years. 
He went to Parsons. He’s an architectural designer. He’s an alcoholic 
too. When you live alone, you need something to keep you warm.     Bill catches on
that he needs this guy. Did anyone ever know you were sleeping in the park? Do the police ever
bother you? Everyone is interested in him. They’re trying to get him to sign the release form.
You know how politics works. The crew is loving the action. The guy is signing his name.
Everyone enjoys bringing this man into the film. He’s like a gift from God that even Bill
couldn’t have predicted, only taken advantage of. Victor invites the crew into his bushes. It’s
not worth it when you have to live off someone’s back. When I saw the Negroes and Puerto
Ricans and the whites pushing their wagons, with all the intelligence I’ve got I gave up. I can’t
fight politicians or money. The only people who don’t seem interested are the actors. “Love is a
feeling of desire, one for the other,” says the interloper.     I never like to say goodbye; I say so
long.         They all walk away together. I never say goodbye, I like to say ciao. 
The film returns 
to Bill instructing a Black couple         on how to do the scene. He’s going 
to do a line reading with them.

 
 
 

ANAÏS DUPLAN is a trans* poet, curator, and artist. He is the author of a book of essays, Blackspace: On the Poetics of an Afrofuture (Black Ocean, 2020), a full-length poetry collection, Take This Stallion (Brooklyn Arts Press, 2016), and a chapbook, Mount Carmel and the Blood of Parnassus (Monster House Press, 2017). He has taught poetry at the University of Iowa, Columbia University, Sarah Lawrence College, and St. Joseph’s College.

His video works have been exhibited by Flux Factory, Daata Editions, the 13th Baltic Triennial in Lithuania, Mathew Gallery, NeueHouse, the Paseo Project, and will be exhibited at the Institute of Contemporary Art in L.A in 2021.

As an independent curator, he has facilitated curatorial projects in Chicago, Boston, Santa Fe, and Reykjavík. He was a 2017-2019 joint Public Programs fellow at the Museum of Modern Art and the Studio Museum in Harlem. In 2016, he founded the Center for Afrofuturist Studies, an artist residency program for artists of color, based at Iowa City’s artist-run organization Public Space One. He works as Program Manager at Recess.

Originally published in No Tokens.
Published in March 2021 in
poiesis 2.1: syzygy by w the trees.